Green triangular warning sign with black exclamation mark and text Greenwashing, resin wall art, epoxy resin wall art

Greenwashing Unmasked

When “eco-friendly” becomes a marketing label rather than a mission, where does creativity end and deception begin? In the art world, greenwashing can undermine trust, pollute reputations, and confuse the very audience we aim to inspire. This article helps you spot greenwashing in art and design, make claims responsibly, and maintain artistic and ethical integrity.


1) What is Greenwashing (and why artists care)

Greenwashing is the practice of making misleading or unsubstantiated claims about environmental benefits. It can range from the subtle (“printed with plant-based ink” without mention of sourcing) to the overt (“carbon neutral” when no offsets exist).

In the art world, stakes are especially high: collectors expect authenticity. When a buyer realizes the “sustainable” claim was more PR than practice, it erodes confidence—not just for the artist, but for the broader movement.

Why deliberate awareness matters:

  • Builds trust with collectors and institutions.
  • Ensures you don’t misrepresent your process or violate consumer laws.
  • Prevents being outed by critics or NGOs (which happens).

Art, being symbolic, must align message with method.


2) Forms of Greenwashing in the Creative Sector

Type

Description

Example in Art/Design

Vague claim

Using words like “green,” “eco,” “sustainable” without qualifiers

Label “eco print” but no detail on ink, paper, or carbon emissions

Hidden trade-offs

Highlighting one benefit while ignoring high-impact areas

A canvas is recycled, but shipped across oceans with plastic wrap

Irrelevant claim

Claiming something is free of a banned substance when that substance is already banned

“Lead-free pigment” when lead pigments are already regulated

No proof or certification

Making strong claims without data, certificates, or third-party audit

“Carbon neutral” without showing calculation or offset source

Misleading visuals

Using nature imagery or green coloring to imply sustainability

A leafy icon on packaging that hides the fact it’s plastic

A 2020 Journal of Consumer Policy article found that in many industries, vague green claims mislead over half of consumers. Artists are not immune.


3) Three Case Studies

A. The “Biodegradable Resin” Label

An artist markets a resin piece as “100% biodegradable epoxy.” But epoxy–by its nature—doesn’t fully break down. In reviews, critics realized no case-study, no decomposition data was provided. The claim was removed after social media backlash.

B. The Big Gallery’s “Carbon Tilt”

A gallery advertisement reads “100% Carbon Offset Shipping.” But investigation finds they buy offsets from projects unverified or double-counted—resulting in greenwash more than neutrality. One NGO flagged it publicly.

C. The Mycelium Packaging Fail

A design firm uses mushroom packaging and labels it “eco.” However, they laminate the outer layer in plastic for water resistance—making it non-compostable. The branding failed to mention the coating’s environmental cost.

These stories highlight the gap between intention and execution.


4) How to Make Real Claims: Best Practices

  • Measure first, claim later. Do a footprint estimate: energy, distance, materials.
  • Use recognized standards. Gold Standard, VCS, ISO protocols.
  • Be precise. “Offset XY grams of COe,” not “carbon neutral.”
  • Speak truthfully. If only part of your process is sustainable, acknowledge it.
  • Disclose assumptions. Let educated buyers (or critics) see your math.

If ever in doubt: don’t claim it.


5) Greenwashing Detection — Checklist

Use this checklist when assessing your own branding or evaluating others:

  • Is the claim specific (e.g. “printed 90 % on recycled FSC paper”) or vague (“eco,” “green”)?
  • Is there third-party certification or audit backing it?
  • Does the claim cover the full product life cycle (materials, manufacturing, shipping, disposal)?
  • Are there trade-offs hidden (e.g., recycled paper but shipped overseas)?
  • Are visuals (icons, colors) implying “green” without supporting content?
  • Do you provide documentation or data for your claim?
  • Can the consumer verify your claim (website link, QR code, offset registry)?
  • If the worst-case scenario happened (returns, damage), does your claim still hold up?
  • Do you disclose what is not green or still in progress?
  • Are your offsets truly additional (i.e. that project wouldn’t have happened without your support)?

If you answer no / “can’t prove it” to more than two items, you may have a greenwashing risk.


6) Language to Use (and Avoid)

Better phrases

  • “Processed with water-based inks”
  • “Printed locally, reducing transport emissions by 50 %”
  • “Offset remaining emissions via Gold Standard project”
  • “Packaged in 100 % recyclable materials”

Avoid these ambiguous terms

  • “Eco” (alone)
  • “Green product” (without qualifiers)
  • “Zero emissions” (unless fully audited)
  • “Sustainable” (unless defined)


7) Tools & Resources for Verification

  • Green Claims Verification (EU) — regulatory framework for substantiable eco claims
  • CarbonNeutral Protocol — standards for making “carbon neutral” claims
  • ISO 14021 Environmental Labels and Declarations — rules for self-declared environmental claims
  • Gold Standard and VCS — verified offset registries
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation — for circular economy design frameworks


8) Why Authenticity Pays

When you skip greenwashing, several benefits accrue:

  • Deeper trust from collectors
  • Less risk of legal or reputational backlash
  • The ability to speak legitimately about sustainability in your marketing
  • A more resilient studio model built on integrity

Consider: a collector returns a piece and realizes your "eco claim" was shallow. That story spreads faster than any ad.


9) Example Claim Before & After

Before (greenwashed):

“Carbon-neutral print, eco paper, sustainable art.”

After (truthful and strong):

“Printed in Helsinki using FSC-certified paper and water-based inks. Packaged in recycled krafters and shipped via EV courier. The remaining 50 g COe is offset via Gold Standard reforestation.”

The second is longer—but credible, verifiable, and defensible.


10) Final Thoughts

Greenwashing preys on hope. The cure is clarity, accountability, and humility. When we align our words with our materials, we preserve both the art and the moral integrity behind it.

 

Main References & Resources

    • https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/green-claims-directive_en
    • https://www.oecd.org/environment/consumption-innovation/green-claims.htm
    • https://www.iso.org/standard/66631.html
    • https://carbonneutral.com/the-carbonneutral-protocol
    • https://www.goldstandard.org
    • https://verra.org/project/vcs-program
    • https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-design
    • https://www.unep.org/resources/report/guidelines-providing-product-sustainability-information

 

Dear reader, you are welcome to scroll down this page, subscribe to my Art Circle Newsletter, and get my free "Eco-Art Studio Toolkit Checklist" (4-in-1 PDF) to join me on this adventure.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.